title: Jan 29 2021 - 05:37:54 PM
date: 2021-01-29 17:37:54
slug: 29-173754
status: published
display_format: short-note
link: https://jj.isgeek.net/2021/01/29-173754/
reply_to: {"url": "https://twitter.com/CassidyJames/status/1354656244565336065", "is_image": false, "twitter": true, "summary": "As much as I prefer native apps, PWAs are an excellent middleground when you know a service would otherwise never e\u2026 https://t.co/Yf8usM09DA", "author": {"name": "Cassidy James Blaede", "username": "CassidyJames", "url": "https://t.co/OnagGxH44g", "image": "https://bm.isgeek.net/db/af/1e78f65d000c97b47a1613144f9cd30967ec7b43a274af45b4458b320bd1.jpg"}, "site_name": "Twitter"}
titleless: True
syndication: https://twitter.com/jjdelc/status/1355208566026756100


As I understand it. Their position isn't "PWAs shouldn't be implemented", but "We don't have resources to work on PWAs at this time" - Sad to hear, but I see it as a push to actually make more PWAs to prove they are important.